[Pw_forum] Problem with pseudopotential

Izaak Williamson izaakw89 at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 29 01:44:56 CEST 2011


Dear all,
 
I was trying to calculate the workfunction for Cu(100) surface. When I plotted 
the planar average of Vbare+VH as a function of z, I found that Vbare+VH at some 
points is higher than Vbare+VH at the vacuum level. I have attached the file 
(planar-average-pbedrrkjus.pdf). I am also attaching the input file Cu100.in. 
Does this mean that the pseudopotential (Cu.pbe-d-rrkjus.UPF) is wrong? Why does 
it behave like this? 


When I do the same calculation with Cu.pbe-n-van_ak.UPF pseudopotential, then I 
get a reasonable graph (planar-average-pbevanak.pdf). Any 
suggestions/explanations would be greatly appreciated. 


Thank you.

-- 
Izaak Williamson
Research Assistant
Physics Department
Boise State University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110328/5c8596a2/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: planar-average-pbedrrkjus.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 8268 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110328/5c8596a2/attachment-0002.pdf 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: planar-average-pbevanak.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 7900 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110328/5c8596a2/attachment-0003.pdf 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Cu100.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 741 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110328/5c8596a2/attachment-0001.obj 


More information about the Pw_forum mailing list