<div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">Actually, the standard of convergency for cut-off energy is not how much dE the system gained, but whether dE/dCut is near to 0 enough. Definitely, such a threahold, for dE/dCut, is also determined by yourself.<br>The example from you was too extreme. Thinking about 100Ry as step, your result are too rough to hold the slope information. But when 10^(-5)Ry was using, even though it should give the very fine dE/dCut information as well, the results may be not good due to the accuracy of DFT, numerical methods, and computer limitation ( please consider the length of float and double float variable ).<br>P.S.: Therefore, I think such question is not the one of sci. &amp; tech. rather than your thinking method. This may be the reason that no person reply such a post in emuch.<br><br><div>--<br>GAO Zhe<br>CMC Lab, Materials Science &amp; Engineering Department,<br>Seoul National University, South Korea<br>        
&nbsp;</div><div id="divNeteaseMailCard"></div><br><pre><br>At&nbsp;2011-12-13&nbsp;15:43:04,"ÌÕÅô"&nbsp;&lt;ptao10b@imr.ac.cn&gt;&nbsp;wrote:
&gt;Dear&nbsp;all,
&gt;
&gt;I've&nbsp;asked&nbsp;sevral&nbsp;people&nbsp;about&nbsp;the&nbsp;convergence&nbsp;criteria&nbsp;of&nbsp;Ecutrho&nbsp;test.&nbsp;They&nbsp;point&nbsp;out&nbsp;that&nbsp;the&nbsp;convergence&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;achieved&nbsp;when&nbsp;the&nbsp;difference&nbsp;between&nbsp;two&nbsp;adjacent&nbsp;scf&nbsp;calculation&nbsp;is&nbsp;smaller&nbsp;than&nbsp;0.1&nbsp;meV.&nbsp;However,&nbsp;they&nbsp;are&nbsp;not&nbsp;very&nbsp;sure&nbsp;about&nbsp;the&nbsp;step&nbsp;length.&nbsp;From&nbsp;my&nbsp;view,&nbsp;the&nbsp;step&nbsp;length&nbsp;may&nbsp;pose&nbsp;huge&nbsp;effects&nbsp;on&nbsp;our&nbsp;calculation.&nbsp;Consider&nbsp;the&nbsp;cases&nbsp;of&nbsp;step&nbsp;lengths&nbsp;are&nbsp;100&nbsp;Ry&nbsp;and&nbsp;0.00001Ry&nbsp;respectively,&nbsp;the&nbsp;latter&nbsp;will&nbsp;be&nbsp;convergent&nbsp;immediately&nbsp;while&nbsp;the&nbsp;former&nbsp;will&nbsp;not&nbsp;be&nbsp;so&nbsp;fast.
&gt;
&gt;For&nbsp;the&nbsp;resons&nbsp;above,&nbsp;I'm&nbsp;really&nbsp;confused&nbsp;now.&nbsp;And&nbsp;could&nbsp;any&nbsp;nice&nbsp;guy&nbsp;show&nbsp;me&nbsp;the&nbsp;strict&nbsp;judgement&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;convergence&nbsp;for&nbsp;Ecutrho?&nbsp;Thank&nbsp;you&nbsp;very&nbsp;much!
&gt;
&gt;Yours,
&gt;Plato&nbsp;Tao
&gt;&nbsp;
&gt;--
&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------
&gt;PH.D.&nbsp;candidate&nbsp;Peng&nbsp;Tao&nbsp;
&gt;Magnetism&nbsp;and&nbsp;Magnetic&nbsp;Materials&nbsp;Division
&gt;National&nbsp;Laboratory&nbsp;for&nbsp;Material&nbsp;Science
&gt;Institute&nbsp;of&nbsp;Metal&nbsp;Research,&nbsp;Chinese&nbsp;Academy&nbsp;of&nbsp;Sciences
&gt;Phone&nbsp;&nbsp;+86-024-83978751
&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;_______________________________________________
&gt;Pw_forum&nbsp;mailing&nbsp;list
&gt;Pw_forum@pwscf.org
&gt;http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
</pre></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span>